<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:yt="http://gdata.youtube.com/schemas/2007">
   <channel>
      <title>Employment Law RSS Mix</title>
      <description>Pipes Output</description>
      <link>http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.info?_id=4h_6rHU83hG6ND4D1pzWFw</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:27:06 -0800</pubDate>
      <generator>http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/</generator>
      <item>
         <title>New Labor and Employment ALI Members</title>
         <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2009/11/new-labor-and-employment-ali-members.html</link>
         <author>laborprof lpb</author>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0120a6cbf3af970b</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:31:44 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Conkright Amicus Brief</title>
         <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2009/11/conkright-amicus-brief.html</link>
         <author>laborprof lpb</author>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef012875cc07b1970c</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:46:16 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Baker &amp; McKenzie: Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Compliance - Managing the Global Visa ...</title>
         <link>http://mycorporateresource.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=32366&amp;Itemid=548</link>
         <description>Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Compliance - Managing the Global Visa Process and Global Operations Baker McKenzie
November 2009</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:47:28 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Woman Successful in KBR Sexual Assault Arbitration</title>
         <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2009/11/woman-successful-in-kbr-sexual-assault-arbitration.html</link>
         <author>laborprof lpb</author>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0120a6c950d2970b</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:50:01 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>McKennirey on Reforming the Labour-Trade Linkage</title>
         <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2009/11/mckennirey-on-reforming-the-labourtrade-linkage.html</link>
         <author>laborprof lpb</author>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef012875cab6c1970c</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:44:39 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>FMLA Podcast on Military Families Amendments</title>
         <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2009/11/fmla-podcast-on-military-families-amendments-.html</link>
         <author>laborprof lpb</author>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef012875ca9d64970c</guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:19:49 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bingham: Ninth Circuit Has Individual Managers Facing Exposure to Personal Liability for ...</title>
         <link>http://mycorporateresource.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=32346&amp;Itemid=319</link>
         <description>Ninth Circuit Has Individual Managers Facing Exposure to Personal Liability for FLSA Wage Claims [Boucher v. Shaw] Bingham
November 23, 2009 Please see our Hot Topics for more on this subject.</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:00:57 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bass, Berry &amp; Sims: Department of Labor Announces Increase in Wage and Hour Staff for ...</title>
         <link>http://mycorporateresource.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=32343&amp;Itemid=316</link>
         <description>Department of Labor Announces Increase in Wage and Hour Staff for Enforcement Bass, Berry Sims
November 23, 2009</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:52:47 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Baker Donelson: Government Responds To Growing H1N1 Pandemic</title>
         <link>http://mycorporateresource.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=32333&amp;Itemid=548</link>
         <description>Government Responds To Growing H1N1 Pandemic Baker Donelson
November 23, 2009 Please see our Hot Topics for more on this subject.</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:12:27 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Paul Hastings: The Employer Provisions of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ...</title>
         <link>http://mycorporateresource.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=32315&amp;Itemid=318</link>
         <description>(content/blogcategory/585/767/) for more on this subject.</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:48:24 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>More Support for Two-Member Board Decisions</title>
         <link>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2009/11/more-support-for-twomember-board-decisions.html</link>
         <author>laborprof lpb</author>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341bfae553ef0120a6c6b998970b</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:19:09 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Review granted in Yabsley v. Cingular Wireless</title>
         <link>http://www.uclpractitioner.com/2009/11/review-granted-in-yabsley-v-cingular-wireless.html</link>
         <description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;On Thursday, November 19, 2009, the Supreme Court issued a &quot;grant and hold&quot; order in &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/dockets.cfm?dist=0&amp;amp;doc_id=1919286&amp;amp;doc_no=S176146&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Yabsley v. Cingular Wireless&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, no. S716146, &quot;pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in &lt;em&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/dockets.cfm?dist=0&amp;amp;doc_id=1911472&amp;amp;doc_no=S173972&quot;&gt;Loeffler v. Target Corp.&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/em&gt; S173972.&quot;&amp;#0160; (Hyperlink added.) &amp;#0160;Here is the statement of the issue: &lt;blockquote&gt;Does article XIII, section 32 of the California Constitution or Revenue and Taxation Code section 6932 bar a consumer from filing a lawsuit against a retailer under the Unfair Competition Law (Bus. &amp;amp; Prof. Code sections 17200 et seq.) or the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Civ. Code, section 1750 et seq.) alleging that the retailer charged sales tax on transactions that were not taxable? &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is the UCL &quot;unlawful&quot; prong case in which &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.uclpractitioner.com/2009/08/new-ucl-safe-harbor-decision-yabsley-v-cingular-wireless-llc.html&quot;&gt;I thought the opinion contained several non-outcome-determinative errors.&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#0160; That was the primary basis for &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.17200blog.com/pubrequests/YabsleyDepubRequest.pdf&quot;&gt;my depublication request for CAOC&lt;/a&gt;, but it seems clear that review was granted because of the underlying tax law issue raised in the case, which is the same as the issue in &lt;em&gt;Loeffler&lt;/em&gt;.&amp;#0160; Either way, the opinion is no longer citable precedent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more on the case, including links to some of the briefs, see &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.uclpractitioner.com/2009/10/depublication-requests-filed-in-yabsley-v-cingular-wireless.html&quot;&gt;these&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.uclpractitioner.com/2009/10/more-material-from-yabsley-v-cingular-wireless.html&quot;&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.uclpractitioner.com/2009/11/more-supreme-court-briefs-from-yabsley.html&quot;&gt;posts&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;#0160; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
         <author>Kimberly A. Kralowec</author>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345172b069e2012875c65200970c</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The legality and ethics of volunteer internships</title>
         <link>http://newworkplace.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/the-legality-and-ethics-of-volunteer-internships/</link>
         <description>A lot of people are working for free these days. Many are students who are securing unpaid internships as a possible investment in a future career. Others are unemployed and want to gain experience and contacts, so they are volunteering their time and talent. They are heeding advice by career counselors and columnists to offer to work without [...]&lt;img alt=&quot;&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; src=&quot;http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=newworkplace.wordpress.com&amp;blog=5897398&amp;post=2647&amp;subd=newworkplace&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1&quot;/&gt;</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newworkplace.wordpress.com/?p=2647</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:15:06 -0800</pubDate>
         <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p>A lot of people are working for free these days. Many are students who are securing unpaid internships as a possible investment in a future career. Others are unemployed and want to gain experience and contacts, so they are volunteering their time and talent. They are heeding advice by career counselors and columnists to offer to work without pay as a way of opening doors to new jobs and careers.</p>
<p>From a practical standpoint, I don&#8217;t blame anyone for using the internship/volunteer route to enter or re-enter the workforce, especially in today&#8217;s difficult economy. As an educator, I have given that advice many times to students and recent graduates. But I do so with ambivalence. Something is very wrong with our economic system when those who provide genuine labor are not compensated for their work. While I can understand public and non-profit employers having to rely on unpaid interns, it is wrong when profit-making enterprises do not pay at least the minimum wage.</p>
<p>In addition, it&#8217;s very likely that many of these arrangements &#8212; especially the common practice of unpaid internships &#8212; violate minimum wage laws. The Fair Labor Standards Act, the federal wage and hour statute, does allow exemptions to the minimum wage for those who meet &#8220;trainee&#8221; status. However, one of the requirements for trainee status is that the employer &#8220;derives no immediate advantage from the activities of the trainees or students, and on occasion his/her operations may actually be impeded.&#8221; This is an awfully tough standard to meet. Most interns provide an &#8220;immediate advantage&#8221; to the employer, even if the work involves relatively unskilled labor.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not necessarily the small &#8220;mom &amp; pop&#8221; businesses that are stiffing their interns. Several years ago, in researching a law review article on the rights of student interns (see link below), I was stunned to learn that as of 2000, employers such the ACLU, Brookings Institution, CNN, Merrill Lynch, MTV, <em>Rolling Stone</em> magazine, Sotheby&#8217;s auction house, and the White House were among the prestigious and presumably well-financed entities whose internship programs provided no compensation. Hopefully that has changed, but even so, today there is no shortage of other employers who happily accept free labor.</p>
<p>We have become so accustomed to unpaid internships as a rite of passage that we ignore the significant social and economic class implications. Fields such as journalism (print and electronic), politics, and the arts are infamous for offering unpaid internships. It means that these opportunities are disproportionately limited to those who can afford to work for free. </p>
<p>I am skeptical that there will be any hue and cry against this widespread practice. For students, volunteer internships have become very much a part of the educational and credentialing experience, and now many unemployed folks are joining the fray. But is the minimum wage really too much to ask for anyone who is providing genuine work contributions to an employer?</p>
<p><em><strong>For a freely downloadable pdf copy of my law review article, The Employment Law Rights of Student Interns (Connecticut Law Review, 2002):</strong></em> <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1303705">http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1303705</a></p> <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/newworkplace.wordpress.com/2647/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/newworkplace.wordpress.com/2647/"/></a> <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/newworkplace.wordpress.com/2647/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/newworkplace.wordpress.com/2647/"/></a> <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/newworkplace.wordpress.com/2647/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/newworkplace.wordpress.com/2647/"/></a> <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/newworkplace.wordpress.com/2647/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/newworkplace.wordpress.com/2647/"/></a> <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/newworkplace.wordpress.com/2647/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/newworkplace.wordpress.com/2647/"/></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=newworkplace.wordpress.com&blog=5897398&post=2647&subd=newworkplace&ref=&feed=1"/></div>]]></content:encoded>
         <media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/81d4f396a0ba874ea42f8107b53bb8bb?s=96&amp;amp;d=identicon&amp;amp;r=G" medium="image">
            <media:title>dcy1959</media:title>
         </media:content>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Second Wave of I-9 Audits: ICE Sends Notices of Inspection to 1,000 Employers.</title>
         <link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8696</link>
         <description>On November 19, 2009, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced that it had issued Notices of Inspection (NOIs) to 1,000 employers across the country who are involved with critical infrastructure. The NOIs mean ICE will be auditing the employers' hiring records, specifically their Form I-9s, to determine compliance with the employment eligibility verification laws.</description>
         <author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8696</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>ICE Issues Another Round of Immigration I-9 Notices of Inspection.</title>
         <link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8697</link>
         <description>On November 19, 2009, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Assistant Secretary John Morton announced the issuance of Form I-9 Notices of Inspection to 1,000 employers nationwide. The Notices of Inspection require employers to allow ICE to inspect their I-9 forms to determine compliance with employment eligibility verification laws. This is ICE's second round of immigration audits this year. The first round occurred on July 1, 2009, when ICE issued Notices of Inspection to 652 businesses.</description>
         <author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8697</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Paid Sick Leave Remaining in Focus, Congress Weighs Alternative Measures.</title>
         <link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8698</link>
         <description>Employers may be required to provide seven days of paid sick time per year under a bill introduced in Congress. The measure, titled the Pandemic Protection for Workers, Families, and Businesses Act (H.R. 4092/S. 2790), was introduced by Representative Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) in the House and Senator Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) in the Senate on the heels of another, less expansive, emergency paid sick leave bill proposed earlier. If passed, the Pandemic Protection Act would be a temporary law that expires two years from enactment. Some believe Congress would make it permanent once it has gone into effect.</description>
         <author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8698</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Reminder: Publicly Held Corporations Should Evaluate Bonus Compensation Arrangements Before 2010.</title>
         <link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8699</link>
         <description>Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, a publicly held corporation may not deduct in a taxable year more than $1 million of compensation for any key executive officer who is considered a &quot;covered employee,&quot;[1] unless the compensation qualifies as performance-based. As discussed in our prior Alert, on February 21, 2008, the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2008-13, which provided that compensation will no longer qualify as &quot;performance-based&quot; under Section 162(m) if it may be paid upon a termination of service without cause or a resignation for good reason, or upon a voluntary retirement, and without regard to actual performance. The Revenue Ruling represented a reversal of the IRS' previous position on this issue, but the IRS offered some transition relief by providing that its new position would not apply to either (1) compensation for which the performance period begins on or before January 1, 2009; or (2) compensation that is payable pursuant to the terms of an employment contract as in effect on February 21, 2008 (without respect to future renewals or extensions of such contract, whether automatic or by agreement).</description>
         <author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8699</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Medical Testing for Immigrants: Reductions and Alternatives.</title>
         <link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8700</link>
         <description>Temporary and permanent visa applicants to the U.S. no longer need to mention HIV infection. Applicants for U.S. permanent residence no longer will be tested for HIV, will be able to obtain more relevant and less cumbersome tuberculosis testing (where available), and no longer will be required to get HPV vaccines. A new medical form is in effect in the U.S. as of 10/14/2009, but further revision will follow.</description>
         <author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8700</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>H-1B Cap Approaching: Hurry to File!</title>
         <link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8701</link>
         <description>After months of virtually no movement in the number of H-1B cap cases received by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the number of cases filed toward the 2010 Fiscal Year (FY 2010) cap of 65,000 surged to 55,600 as of November 13, 2009. Thus, there is a new urgency for employers to quickly file H-1B petitions for any individuals subject to the H-1B cap, including: F-1/J-1 employees (especially those whose employment authorization will expire before September 30, 2010); prospective employees currently outside of the Unites States; and employees currently working in another time-limited visa classification (such as L-1B or TN).</description>
         <author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8701</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>E-Verify Updates  Federal Contractors, Illinois Special Certification, Supreme Court Mulls Arizona Law.</title>
         <link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8702</link>
         <description>President Barack Obama signed a $42.8 billion fiscal year 2010 homeland security appropriations bill that included a three-year extension of the federal governments employment verification system  E-Verify. Approximately $137 million was budgeted to operate the system and further improve its accuracy and compliance rates. Although proposals to make E-Verify mandatory were not included in the final bill, there is clear support for the continuation and expansion of E-Verify as evidenced by the recent implementation of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) requiring certain federal contractors to use the system.</description>
         <author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8702</guid>
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
<!-- fe13.pipes.sp1.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Nov 24 04:27:03 PST 2009 -->
